hmm, on Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:38:09PM +0200, Matthias Kilian said that > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:00:01PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > > (my rationale for removing the option "0: <None>" is that > > i have asked for the package, so why would i choose None? > > i can always ctrl-c out if i have changed my mind...) > > AFAIK, ambiguous packages can also happen during updates (pkg_add > -ui), for example if an updated package has a new dependency on > another package that's available in different flavors. You don't
in that case, isn't the dependency menu shown? (with no <None>) as i understand it, dependencies are not optional, one FLAVOR must be chosen if something depends on it. -f -- what good grammar you got. what school you went?
