On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:15:44PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > isa(4) is an indirect bus, which means that drivers that attach to it > need to provide an xxxprobe() method instead of an xxxmatch() method. > The critical difference is xxxprobe() is given a device softc for the > second argument, whereas a xxxmatch() is given the cfdata as the > second argument. > > However, a number of our ISA device drivers treat the second argument > as a cfdata instead of a softc. Diff below addresses this. (Only > complication: unlike isa(4), isapnp(4) is a direct bus, and if_we.c > used the same probe/match code for both.) > > Does this look right? (Compile tested on i386, but I don't have any > ISA hardware, and I'm not having any luck with qemu's "isapc" machine > at the moment...) >
Appears to make sense to me, but I have no hardware to test with. .... Ken
