Hi guys,

A port I am maintaining uses our file(1) implementation. A debian
dev who was packaging this thinks he has spotted a license bug.

Said I would forward his mail onto OpenBSD, so here it is.

Discuss.

----- Forwarded message from pancake <[email protected]> -----

Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 01:19:26 +0200
From: pancake <[email protected]>
To: Edd Barrett <[email protected]>
Subject: License
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148)

Debian packager has reported a bug in magic license.

COPYRIGHT file contains the 4th clause bsd which is gpl incompatible. The thing 
is that *.c files include the 3clause bsd license which is ok.

Can i remove the 4th clause from the copyright file? This should be reported to 
openbsd too as long as its inconsistent and can be problematic.

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Best Regards
Edd Barrett

http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk

Reply via email to