On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:08:52 +0059 Han Boetes wrote: > So spamd would use the stuttering time to figure out if the ip is > not on an rbl, if the dnsname is reverse resolvable, if the helo > is valid, if the sender is not matching silly pattern, etc etc and > then decide what to do with the attempt, either blacklist or > whitelist the ip. Wouldn't it be nice if spamdb could feed it's > data to a rbldnsd so other mailservers in the domain could use the > same information? > > I think it would result in a much faster and fairer decision > building if a message is spam or ham.
Have you looked at greyscanner in ports. The beauty of spamd is it's configurability. It's easy to add dnsbl support to it with a simple script (for older email addresses you can't be proactive with). That being said I'm sure there's a fair few doing this. Maybe it's so easy no-one thought it was worth doing a greydnsblscanner to put in ports? I'll send mine if you like and then everyone can laugh at how quickly and crudely I wrote my script ;-).
