On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 06:41:31PM +0400, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > Yep, Chris Cappuccio. > > He says that there are still issues with the SiS code. Instead > of defaulting to SiS 5597/5598, perhaps it would have been > better not to attach as it would have made the problem more > obvious.
I've committed this now. Unknown SiS devices could still be attached with udma disabled if we were sure the 5597/5598 case is only used in machines with 5597_HB and and another else. For now I've opted not to do this, it seems they are out of the chipset business. Their webpage doesn't mention them in the products section, so we can only hope.
