I was working on replacing bind with unbound and nsd a half year ago. I run into this problem. I think in local networks you get such setups where you have to serve clients with global request like google.de and local requests like mail.inhouse.company.com.
I just want to hint this problem. In my opinion the replacement of bind with unbound and nsd is more important than the support for this kind of setups :-) On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:01:46PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Jan Klemkow <j.klem...@wemelug.de> [2012-02-17 10:45]: > > There is an other problem with replacing bind with unbound and nsd. > > If you have a setup where you need to do authoritative and recursive > > resolving of domains with the same socket and you have to synchronise > > with an extern dns server over zone transfers. > > I see no reason to support or even remotely take such a stupid setup > into consideration. > > -- > Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org > BS Web Services, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP > Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services. Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully > Managed > Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/ > -- Jan Klemkow
