On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Landry Breuil <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 03:24:05PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote: >> linux does >> >> worth pointing out that some tests in old firefox ports (maybe still >> there) failed because the lack of -not > > Are you thinking about > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665040 ?
yes well, don't let my talk of 8 month old resolved bug reports persuade you "-not" stands on its own merits. > Anyway, i think that was the only occurence of -not, since > grep -r -- ' \-not' B * in mozilla-central yields nothing. > > Landry > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Ted Unangst <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso wrote: >> >> this patch adds the -not operator to find(1). >> >> I personally always found -not easier to use due to shell >> >> escaping, but today may laziness has bitten back. >> >> And "it's just one more non-POSIX-compliant option". >> > >> > This makes a lot of sense to me, but it's good to research what other >> > systems support the same option. B Linux, FreeBSD, and Solaris are >> > worthy references.
