There's nothing *technically* wrong with "irrespective," but it is a tad awkward when compared with "regardless."
"irregardless" is a hangable offense. On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Jason McIntyre <[email protected]>wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:46:46PM -0400, Kjell Wooding wrote: > > s/irrespective/regardless/ > > > > there's nothing wrong with "irrespective". it's used correctly here (to > mean exactly the same as "regardless"). are you maybe confusing it with > the classic "irregardless"? > > "irregardless" is sometimes worth slipping in, in my opinion ;) > > jmc > > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Sunil Nimmagadda < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > This version implements some off-list review comments... > > > > > > 1. Discard explicit checking whether command exists and it's > > > permissions since shell already does and reports error. > > > > > > 2. Remove unnecessary bzero call. > > > > > > 3. Document minor deviation from emacs behaviour in README. > > > > > > Index: README > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/README,v > > > retrieving revision 1.8 > > > diff -u -p -r1.8 README > > > --- README 1 Aug 2011 12:15:23 -0000 1.8 > > > +++ README 20 Mar 2012 17:54:12 -0000 > > > @@ -61,7 +61,9 @@ recognized as special cases. > > > On systems with 16 bit integers, the kill buffer cannot exceed 32767 > > > bytes. > > > > > > - > > > +Unlike GNU Emacs, Mg's minibuffer isn't multi-line aware and hence > > > +some commands like "shell-command-on-region" always pop up a buffer to > > > +display output irrespective of output's size. > > > > > > New implementation oddities:
