Oh even if it's not signed that ternary branch will still be in code. I see. Hm. On May 10, 2012 9:23 AM, "Matthew Dempsky" <[email protected]> wrote:
- Re: c++ headers w/ -pedantic, overflow in implicit constan... Marc Espie
- Re: c++ headers w/ -pedantic, overflow in implicit co... Landry Breuil
- Re: c++ headers w/ -pedantic, overflow in implicit co... Matthew Dempsky
- Re: c++ headers w/ -pedantic, overflow in implici... Otto Moerbeek
- Re: c++ headers w/ -pedantic, overflow in imp... Matthew Dempsky
- Re: c++ headers w/ -pedantic, overflow in... Matthew Dempsky
- Re: c++ headers w/ -pedantic, overflow in implici... Marc Espie
- Re: c++ headers w/ -pedantic, overflow in imp... Miod Vallat
- Re: c++ headers w/ -pedantic, overflow in... Otto Moerbeek
