It's a step in the right direction, but compare this: # route add 5.5.5.1/26 127.0.0.1 add net 5.5.5.1/26: gateway 127.0.0.1
# route delete 5.5.5.1/26 delete net 5.5.5.1/26 ...with this: # route add -inet6 ff55::1/96 ::1 add net ff55::1/96: gateway ::1 # route delete -inet6 ff55::1/96 route: writing to routing socket: No such process delete net ff55::1/96: not in table # route delete -inet6 ff55::/96 delete net ff55::/96 I think the address should be masked in the same way for both v4 and v6.
