On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Mike Belopuhov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Ted Unangst <[email protected]> wrote: >> The acpihpet timer is, in my testing, lots better than the acpitimer. >> Faster to read and more precise. They should not have the same quality >> value. Double acpihpet. >> > > as long as acpi subsystem attaches acpitimer earlier we don't > need that since acpihpet always prevails.
actually regardless when it gets attached, it will always prevail as long as it's frequency is higher.
