On 2012/10/15 16:18, David Coppa wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Gregor Best <g...@ring0.de> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:05:36AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Gregor Best <g...@ring0.de> wrote: > >> > This patch simply halves the timeslice processes get until they are > >> > preempted. This patch is standalone and the rest of the patches does not > >> > depend on it, but I figured I'd throw it in anyway. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Gregor Best > >> > > >> > >> Didn't get this patch. Is it me or the patch is missing? > >> > > > > The patch was the message my mail was in reply to. There's no Patch 2/5 > > subject line because I forgot to change that after sending out Patch > > 1/5. > > Can you resend it, please? > I'm confused... > > TIA, > David >
Best to send the diff, with the accompanying text, in the same email, and make sure they still all apply, I tried testing some of these but didn't manage to get them to apply (either some conflicting change, or they were in the wrong order and stacked up on top of each other or something).
