> Looking at the source of scan_ffs, 512 is hardcoded all over the place. > Would it be an improvement to have that configurable, for the newer disks > with bigger size?
No. ffs information is layed out on the disk in 512 byte chunks.
> Looking at the source of scan_ffs, 512 is hardcoded all over the place. > Would it be an improvement to have that configurable, for the newer disks > with bigger size?
No. ffs information is layed out on the disk in 512 byte chunks.