On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Tomas Bodzar <tomas.bod...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somewhat strange results here
>
> $ ifconfig em0 hwfeatures
> em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         hwfeatures=36<CSUM_TCPv4,CSUM_UDPv4,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING>
>         lladdr XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX
>         priority: 0
>         groups: egress
>         media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex,rxpause,txpause)
>         status: active
>         inet X.X.X.X netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast X.X.X.X
> $
>
> "Intel Q45 KT" rev 0x03 at pci0 dev 3 function 3 not configured
> em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel ICH10 D BM LM" rev 0x02: msi,
> address X:X:X:X:X:X
>
> I can ping gateway, I can ping various servers on Internet via IP or
> DNS name, Apache from base running under chroot with HTTP and HTTPS
> and blogsum provided via HTTP. I can ssh login to that machine, I can
> view blogsum from remote machines, but localy on server xombrero or
> lynx is not able to display ANY web page, not even from local Apache.
>
>
>

On VMware Player 5 it seems to be fine including SSH, cvs,
webbrowsing, pf for desktop use, remote X

$ ifconfig em0 hwfeatures
em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        hwfeatures=36<CSUM_TCPv4,CSUM_UDPv4,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING>
        lladdr X:X:X:X:X:X
        priority: 0
        groups: egress
        media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex,master)
        status: active
        inet X.X.X.X netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast X.X.X.X
$

em0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82545EM)" rev 0x01:
apic 1 int 18, address X:X:X:X:X:X


>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:50 AM, mxb <m...@alumni.chalmers.se> wrote:
>> In my case,
>> it is a CARP backup(master will be upgraded soon) rolling ospf on top of gre 
>> on top of ipsec, running npppd,
>> and daily NAT/RDR for about 100 clients.
>>
>> On 6 nov 2012, at 21:31, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>>
>>> For people who are testing checksum-offload-enabling diffs, it would
>>> help if you could say what sort of things have tested. Things like
>>> fragments/NFS are far more likely to exercise bugs in the hardware
>>> than standard web browsing.

Reply via email to