On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 06:47:49PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/12/21 18:31, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > > -There's no hardware involved: thru boxes are created by > > > +There is no hardware involved: thru boxes are created by > > > > i don;t see why this is an improvement. what's wrong with it? > > "No hardware is involved" might be a slight improvement,
i'm not sure why. if anything, passive voice is probably harder to understand than active. it might read better to some people, but why change it when it's currently correct and clear? > "There is no ..." looks rather awkward to me. > i don;t have any problem with that either, i just don;t see any benefit in making the change. jmc
