On 03/06/2013 04:37 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I looked at this some time ago (because it's super annoying if you do > this on a remote system to swap the active port around and forget about > the behaviour ;) but I have some recollection there might have been > a bit more to it than this.. anyone remember? >
Hi, I have talked with mpf@ and he mentioned that the if_down() probabely might be there to ensure that no new packets are processed while the trunk port interface is removed. Perhaps one could issue an explicit if_up() at the end of trunk_port_destroy()? Any thoughts about this? Greetings, Matthias
