On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 03:37:25PM +0100, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > > OK, perhaps should I have taken more time to explain my thinking: > my understanding was indeed that those had been on-purpose unlinked from > the build, and I do not suggest re-linking them. My point was just to > make the sendmail documentation that is still shipped in the source tree > more visible (correcting the etc/mail/README file was probably the most > important bit). > > But given that smtpd is pretty stable and (I might be wrong, I didn't > discuss it with people involved) should soon replace sendmail as the one > and only MTA in base, I thought updating this Makefile would just be > a one-shot job with no possible side-effect. It's very unlikely that > a new Sendmail release lands into base, right? > > I would understand a plain "no" here, but then I'd suggest to just > remove the /usr/share/doc/smm/08.sendmailop/op.me reference in > etc/mail/README. >
sorry, i obviously didn;t read the diff well enough. i agree at least mail/README should be fixed. i'll see what millert thinks. > PS: are there people already working on a sendmail port? > -- i'll leave that for someone better qualified to answer. jmc
