Re: kern decrement

[Ted Unangst]

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:13, Andres Perera wrote:

>> +#define DECREMENT(x)   x--
> 
> why not (x)--?

I was lazy. (x) would be better.

> why not intmax_t instead of int64_t?

64 bits ought to be enough for anyone. :)