On Apr 27, 2013, at 9:28 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:09:25PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>> On backtrace(3) (which is a GNU thing, I know), static functions don't
>> show up with their respective names even though they are in the binary.
>> That's a tad annoying, but I am not aware of any other limitation. Can
>> someone please enlighten me?
> That's not true in general. backtrace(3) or any other user of the
> .eh_frame section for unwinding won't see individual records for inlined
> functions. Static functions are more likely to get inlined, but the same
> can happen with non-inline functions defined in the same file.

Ok, thanks. Sounds like an impasse. GCC does what it wants, but then
-fno-inline is also not an option for the build?


Reply via email to