On 10 May 2013 14:57, Gerhard Roth <[email protected]> wrote: > Mike, > > but it does check in vscsiopen(). Hence no userland program should be > able to call vscsiioctl() for a non-existant device because the open() > already failed. At least that's true as long as vscsi devices can't > disappear during run-time. > > Gerhard >
my intention here is very simple: there's a way you should call device_lookup and everyone has to fulfill it's part of the contract. all our devices do, vscsi doesn't. what's the reason for it to be one of a kind?
