On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 03:52:45PM +0200, Anders Berggren wrote: > >>> The following patch clarifies that sending "r" over the FIFO doesn't > >>> produce the exact same results as SIGUSR1. Or do you prefer that we > >>> change the behaviour of the FIFO's "r" to match SIGUSR1, for example by > >>> changing ui_report() to something similar to ui_report_sa(); opening a > >>> file, and rewrite a few _report functions to use fprintf instead of > >>> LOG_DBG()? > > New diff, produced and prettified by jmc >
looking for an ok... jmc > Index: isakmpd.8 > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/isakmpd/isakmpd.8,v > retrieving revision 1.111 > diff -u -r1.111 isakmpd.8 > --- isakmpd.8 25 Sep 2012 13:58:00 -0000 1.111 > +++ isakmpd.8 12 Jul 2013 13:24:11 -0000 > @@ -494,7 +494,8 @@ > .It Ic r > Report > .Nm > -internal state to a file. > +internal state to > +.Xr syslog 3 . > See the > .Fl R > option.
