On 27/08/13(Tue) 10:44, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:38:49PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > So I started to play with the routine table and I'm slowly trying to > > unify the various code paths to add and delete route entries. The > > diff below is a first step, it splits rtinit() into rt_add() and > > rt_delete() there should be no functional change. > > > > ok? > > That makes soooo much more sense. :-).
mikeb@ pointed out that the names I picked were maybe too generic. This kept me thinking and I'd like to try to separate the logic of adding a route to network vs route to host first. In other words, forget this diff for the moment (:
