* Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> [2013-11-14 18:47]:
> > it is the status quo *right now*
> 
> Look, you can't call something the status quo when a commit was made 1
> month ago, to a REAL status quo that existed for 10 years when itojun
> made the change...  and immediately after this recent commit we
> started arguying about the change.
> 
> Go find out what "status quo" means.

let's not get into this, leads us nowhere.

> > > It *was* being filtered, until a month ago.
> > no news here - we had discussed that change at the time. pretty sure
> > you were in the loop even.
> No, I was not in the loop before it was commited, and many others were
> not either.  Apparently only you and mikeb were, and you did NOT push
> for more people to know about the change before it was commited.

mikeb? bluhm worked on & comitted that otoh.
i'm still pretty damn sure you were Cc'd; won't dig for old mail just
to prove it; don't see the point, doesn't change anything now anyway.

> The non-pf RH0 filtering case is worthwhile.

and here we disagree.

-- 
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services. Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully Managed
Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/

Reply via email to