* Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> [2013-11-14 18:47]: > > it is the status quo *right now* > > Look, you can't call something the status quo when a commit was made 1 > month ago, to a REAL status quo that existed for 10 years when itojun > made the change... and immediately after this recent commit we > started arguying about the change. > > Go find out what "status quo" means.
let's not get into this, leads us nowhere. > > > It *was* being filtered, until a month ago. > > no news here - we had discussed that change at the time. pretty sure > > you were in the loop even. > No, I was not in the loop before it was commited, and many others were > not either. Apparently only you and mikeb were, and you did NOT push > for more people to know about the change before it was commited. mikeb? bluhm worked on & comitted that otoh. i'm still pretty damn sure you were Cc'd; won't dig for old mail just to prove it; don't see the point, doesn't change anything now anyway. > The non-pf RH0 filtering case is worthwhile. and here we disagree. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services. Dedicated Servers, Root to Fully Managed Henning Brauer Consulting, http://henningbrauer.com/
