On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote:
> No need for every thread to have its own name, right?

pthread_set_name_np()?  Would be nice to have that reflect into "ps H"
output if it's used in real programs.  Linux calls that function
pthread_setname_np(), so maybe it's actually in use.

Also, I was thinking of making all the kernel threads (reaper,
usbatsk, idleN, acpi, etc) into threads of proc0 instead of full
processes, saving the process structures, but that only works if you
can still see their names in the output of "ps xak".


Philip Guenther

Reply via email to