On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:02:15AM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This adds support for a few more instruction patterns that are > > apparentl needed by gcc 4.8. Taken from binutils 2.17. Not sure if > > adding NoRex64 to the existing patterns is really necessary, but it > > shouldn't hurt. > > This arose because AMD screwed up and specifed "movd" instead of > "movq" for the "mov r/m64 mm" opcodes, right? If we're going to pull > in the movq changes from binutils 2.17, I think we should pull in the > matching movd changes (including that wonderful comment). > > Looks like even binutils 2.17's disassembler shows this as movd > instead of movq. They must have changed that later. Darn.
What has happened to this diff ? It is required to fix the build of the upcoming version of webkit, which requires gcc 4.8.... Landry
