Em 17-04-2014 14:30, Adam Thompson escreveu:
> Yes, but the very nature of the discussion concerns VMs, where the
> point is to multiplex the physical CPUs into multiple VMs in
> user-controllable chunks. A VM with one vCPU is perfectly reasonable
> and normal.
>
> I've found that having multiple cores available can speed up a
> desktop, and certain classes of cpu-bound server applications, and not
> much else.
> Those applications are not many; databases (sometimes), web servers
> (sometimes), application servers (often).
> The fact my router has 8 cores available doesn't really help it very
> much. (Maybe BGP converges a little bit faster?) Ditto for my DNS
> servers, my mail server, my proxy server, etc.
> So, I would like to know what application Giancarlo has where he
> actually notices the lack of multiple cores.
> -Adam
I use it in my firewall. PF runs on only one core, no issue here. But
there is DNS server, web server, nagios, smtpd, squid, plus some other
things running with it. So having more cpu's would be nice. I see some
cpu throughput bottlenecks now and then. It was more of a rant than
anything else. I will only be able to take a look at why the cpu doesn't
show in a few months. And even then I'm not sure I'll be able to solve
the problem.

-- 
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC

Reply via email to