Hello,
is there a reason why file system fragments are called "blocks" instead of
"frags" in comments in sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h sometime?
The patch below treats only occurrence.
Index: src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h,v
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -p -u -r1.39 fs.h
--- src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h 12 Nov 2013 14:20:52 -0000 1.39
+++ src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h 26 Apr 2014 16:37:06 -0000
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ struct fs {
int64_t fs_sblockloc; /* offset of standard super block */
struct csum_total fs_cstotal; /* cylinder summary information */
int64_t fs_time; /* time last written */
- int64_t fs_size; /* number of blocks in fs */
+ int64_t fs_size; /* number of frags in fs */
int64_t fs_dsize; /* number of data blocks in fs */
int64_t fs_csaddr; /* blk addr of cyl grp summary area */
int64_t fs_pendingblocks; /* blocks in process of being freed */
- OR - another variant, which is more consistent with fs_ffs1_size
description and others. Which of the two, if any, is better? Thank you.
Index: src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h,v
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -p -u -r1.39 fs.h
--- src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h 12 Nov 2013 14:20:52 -0000 1.39
+++ src/sys/ufs/ffs/fs.h 26 Apr 2014 16:35:40 -0000
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ struct fs {
int64_t fs_sblockloc; /* offset of standard super block */
struct csum_total fs_cstotal; /* cylinder summary information */
int64_t fs_time; /* time last written */
- int64_t fs_size; /* number of blocks in fs */
+ int64_t fs_size; /* number of blocks in fs / frags */
int64_t fs_dsize; /* number of data blocks in fs */
int64_t fs_csaddr; /* blk addr of cyl grp summary area */
int64_t fs_pendingblocks; /* blocks in process of being freed */
Regards,
David
