On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:35:11PM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote: > On 9 May 2014 11:47, Kenneth Westerback <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > >>> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas > >>> wrote: > >>> > Fritjof Bornebusch <[email protected]> writes: > >>> > > >>> > [...] > >>> > > >>> > > Does no one want to check the diff and give me some feedback? > >>> > > >>> > Regardless of the content of your diff, the date of your mail was: > >>> > > >>> > Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 22:57:57 +0200 > >>> > > >>> > I doubt there are developers that are paid full-time to improve rcs, > >>> > please be more patient. > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 > >>> > E7EE > >>> > >>> Sorry, you are right. > >>> Next time I'll be more patient. > >>> > >>> fritjof > >>> > >> Come on, nobody? > >> If my diffs point to the wrong direction, then please tell me! > >> > >> fritjof > >> > > > > No one has the time or interest apparently. Whining about it every > > couple of days does not help motivate people to drop their current > > work to look at your stylistic tweaks. > > > > .... Ken > > I apologize for the unintentionally harsh tone. We are always > interested in getting diffs. > > .... Ken
No problem. But if you like OpenRCS as it is and don't want to get any diffs unless security fixes, then just say it. Or if you work on other stuff and you don't have time for that, then just say it. fritjof
