On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 06:11:16AM -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 03:03 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > If lynx was removed from base, and only available in ports... how many of > > you would even know of it's existance and use it? > > Not only would I know of its existence and go install it to use, I would > wonder out loud why the hell it's not in base. > > Furthermore, if it had been intentionally crippled to exclude rare but > definitely used protocols like gopher that are part of "stock" Lynx as > released by the current maintainers, I would wonder what kind of whacked > out hallucinogenics someone had to have been on to do such a thing. > (It's something I'd expect from Firefox developers, but definitely not > from OpenBSD maintaners.)
Beware with such statements, some have both hats. Landry
