On 14/08/14 5:09 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
On 13/08/14 6:42 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
ive had this for 2 years or so. updated to current again.
its been tested on the following:
bnx0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5708" rev 0x12: apic 8 int 16
bnx1 at pci13 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5708" rev 0x12: apic 8 int 16
bnx0: address 00:1e:4f:1b:26:53
brgphy0 at bnx0 phy 1: BCM5708C 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 6
bnx1: address 00:1e:4f:1b:26:51
brgphy1 at bnx1 phy 1: BCM5708C 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 6
itd be nice to get tests on other variants.
ok?
This is exactly the same diff that was posted in the past
and it wouldn't be any less broken on the BCM5709 chipsets
now.
Since someone said I should say what I did in a clearer manner..
Since the diff has not changed and was broken when it was originally
posted then it will still be broken now.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
