On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 06:45:54PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 02:56:25PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote: > Ping? > > Hi tech, > > > > during my search after other xfree() implementations, I saw > > that xfree() in sndiod is just a wrapper for free() without any > > other conditions, like NULL check. > >
As I already mentioned. I'd prefer we keep the xfree() wrapper because occasionally I instrument xmalloc and xfree to debug memory usage. FWIW, there are neither 0-sized memory allocations nor calls to free() with NULL argument. So feel free to add the corresponding checks.
