On 3 September 2014 15:53, Martin Pieuchot <mpieuc...@nolizard.org> wrote:
> On 03/09/14(Wed) 15:25, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> Drivers that need a splnet() protection inside their SIOCSIFADDR
>> generally raise the spl level themselves, so we should not need
>> to do that in in{6,}_ifinit(). One exception to this rule is,
>> as always, carp(4)...
>>
>> So the diff below moves the spl dance inside carp's SIOCSIFADDR
>> handler, it's a baby step, so we can take care of carp_set_addr{6,}
>> later.
>
> mikeb@ pointed out that a spl dance was missing from the SIOCDIFADDR_IN6
> ioctl, updated diff below also fixes that.
>
i think we're ready to step on a carefully placed landmine. OK mikeb
