On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 02:28:42 +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > I'd be fine with that one going in as well. > > Are there any reasons not to add it? I don't see a portable alternative > here as brought up by Mark in that thread, and the only "if it's > supported on the majority of UNIX-ike operating system" comment > seems to be true?
My preference is for Ted's patch. I was against this initially but now that it is supported by most modern systems I don't have a problem with it. - todd
