On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 05:41:32PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On 14 November 2014 17:26, Rafael Zalamena <rzalam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:48:11PM -0300, Rafael Zalamena wrote: > >> The following mails will contain patchs that implement the VPLS datapath > >> in OpenBSD. Applying all patchs should allow people to configure a > >> network using VPLS manually. > >> > >> --- snipped diffs descriptions --- > >> > >> How to use: > >> * Create a MPLS network. > >> Example: http://2011.eurobsdcon.org/papers/jeker/MPLS.pdf > >> * Create a pseudowire in both ends of your network (PEs) > >> # ifconfig wire<number> encap ethernet wirelabel <local label> \ > >> <remote label> neighbor <other PE address> <controlword> up > >> > >> # ifconfig wire0 encap ethernet wirelabel 500 500 neighbor 1.2.3.4 up > >> or > >> # ifconfig wire0 encap ethernet wirelabel 500 500 neighbor 1.2.3.4 \ > >> controlword up > >> * Create a bridge between the interface facing your customer (CE) and > >> your wireX, also in both PEs you are configuring the VPN. > >> > >> --- more comments snipped --- > >> > >> TODO list: > >> * interface configuration code - SIOCSETWIRECFG / SIOCGETWIRECFG (DONE) > >> * add / remove wire label (DONE) > >> * add / remove wire control label (DONE) > >> * ethernet-vlan support (WIP) > > > > Ethernet-tagged support almost complete, it's not working in the case when > > you have packets coming with 2 or more tags. I'm having problems to test > > this since 5.6 and -current doesn't do QinQ properly. (I'll be sending > > proposal diffs to fix this soon) > > > >> * ifconfig(8) integration > >> ** show wire configuration (DONE) > >> ** configure wire (DONE) > >> * man page: > >> ** wire(4) (TODO) > >> ** ifconfig(8) (TODO) > > > > wire(4) is depending on some other diffs now that are unrelated to this, > > please see: > > > > (update mpe to use rt_ifa, wire will use that too) > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=141280528700615&w=2 > > > > (fix bridge + vlan, bridge expects the complete packet) > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=141575896420071&w=2 > > > > is it possible to call it something other than just wire(4)? > vpls maybe?
pseudowire(4) then? (looks long to me) I wouldn't call vpls as it may be expanded later to do also VPWS.
