>> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 9:10 PM >> From: "Ted Unangst" <[email protected]> >> To: "Kamil Rytarowski" <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: mg(1) comaptibility patches >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 20:29, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> > 0001-Define-strtonum-3-for-the-NetBSD-target.patch >> >> I don't like this at all. The reason we put strtonum in libc is >> precisely not to have multiple copies of it floating around the tree. >> Uncompiled copies are still clutter. >> >> This may be odd for a BSD system, but perhaps the pkgsrc version could >> link against libbsd? >> > >Actually not as libbsd is in reality GNU/Linux-oriented. > >Other solution is to go backward for strtol(3)-like functions, >what do you think?
Solution to what problem?
