On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 19:25, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as we don't even have the "get" command in base, there is no need to
> support SCCS files anymore.  I also remember that we removed the
> SCCS IDs from source files so...
> 
> Time to tedu sccs?
> 

Are we still tracking upstream patch in any way? I think we've
diverged in a few places, but there still is an upstream, yes?

I certainly don't object to killing sccs support, just making sure it
won't come back in some future update.

Reply via email to