On 11/25/14 18:45, J Sisson wrote: > Hi, > > kerberos was moved to ports, but the docs still link to kerberos(8): > > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#YP_secure > > Does the following diff make sense? (Apologies in advance if gmail > mangles the diff, or if the diff needs to be generated with different > options). > > > > --- www/faq/faq10.html.orig 2014-11-25 15:35:13.828391026 -0800 > +++ www/faq/faq10.html 2014-11-25 15:42:42.269591036 -0800 > @@ -1286,8 +1286,7 @@ > segments carrying YP traffic can bind your YP domain and retrieve its data. > In some cases, passing YP traffic through SSL or IPSec tunnels > might be an option, or you might consider combining YP with > -<a href="http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=kerberos&sektion=8"; > ->kerberos(8)</a> authentication. > +kerberos authentication (available from ports). > > <p> > <a name="YP_server"></a>
good spotting, but I'd prefer to remove the kerberos reference all together (and I did). Nick.
