Hi,
Otto Moerbeek wrote on Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 04:53:28PM +0100:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
>> Hi tech,
>>
>> it's NULL not NUL.
> You're touching a big controversy here. Many developers say that NUL is
> the right term when rferring to chars and not pointers,
Not only that. For the system manuals, we have basically settled
on recommending
.Dv NULL
for the NULL pointer, (void *)0
NUL-terminated \" without any markup
for talking about C strings, "..." ending in '\0'
Yours,
Ingo
