Otto Moerbeek wrote on Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 04:53:28PM +0100:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0100, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:

>> Hi tech,
>> it's NULL not NUL.

> You're touching a big controversy here. Many developers say that NUL is
> the right term when rferring to chars and not pointers,

Not only that.  For the system manuals, we have basically settled
on recommending

  .Dv NULL
        for the NULL pointer, (void *)0
  NUL-terminated  \" without any markup
        for talking about C strings, "..." ending in '\0'


Reply via email to