On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:00, Todd C. Miller wrote: > When these were originally written I wanted to avoid calling external > functions. As a result, strlcat.c in particular is hard to read. > Compilers are smarter and string functions are better these days > so using strlen and mempcy are probably actually faster than doing > byte-oriented string traversal and copies. > > The diff is context rather than unified so you can see the entire > function, before and after.
This looks like a nice improvement to me.
