Use now preferred SipHash24 functions. This also means we shouldn't
need to hash in the value of the dirhash pointer itself, which confuses
me every time I look at it.

Index: ufs/ufs_dirhash.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_dirhash.c,v
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -p -r1.30 ufs_dirhash.c
--- ufs/ufs_dirhash.c   14 Sep 2014 14:17:27 -0000      1.30
+++ ufs/ufs_dirhash.c   3 Dec 2014 03:47:22 -0000
@@ -42,9 +42,10 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_
 #include <sys/vnode.h>
 #include <sys/mount.h>
 #include <sys/sysctl.h>
-#include <sys/hash.h>
 #include <sys/mutex.h>
 
+#include <crypto/siphash.h>
+
 #include <ufs/ufs/quota.h>
 #include <ufs/ufs/inode.h>
 #include <ufs/ufs/dir.h>
@@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ int ufs_dirhashmaxmem;
 int ufs_dirhashmem;
 int ufs_dirhashcheck;
 
+SIPHASH_KEY ufsdirhash_key;
 
 int ufsdirhash_hash(struct dirhash *dh, char *name, int namelen);
 void ufsdirhash_adjfree(struct dirhash *dh, doff_t offset, int diff);
@@ -857,17 +859,7 @@ ufsdirhash_checkblock(struct inode *ip, 
 int
 ufsdirhash_hash(struct dirhash *dh, char *name, int namelen)
 {
-       u_int32_t hash;
-
-       /*
-        * We hash the name and then some other bit of data that is
-        * invariant over the dirhash's lifetime. Otherwise names
-        * differing only in the last byte are placed close to one
-        * another in the table, which is bad for linear probing.
-        */
-       hash = hash32_buf(name, namelen, HASHINIT);
-       hash = hash32_buf(&dh, sizeof(dh), hash);
-       return (hash % dh->dh_hlen);
+       return SipHash24(&ufsdirhash_key, name, namelen) % dh->dh_hlen;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1059,6 +1051,7 @@ ufsdirhash_init(void)
        pool_init(&ufsdirhash_pool, DH_NBLKOFF * sizeof(doff_t), 0, 0, 0,
            "dirhash", &pool_allocator_nointr);
        mtx_init(&ufsdirhash_mtx, IPL_NONE);
+       arc4random_buf(&ufsdirhash_key, sizeof(ufsdirhash_key));
        TAILQ_INIT(&ufsdirhash_list);
 #if defined (__sparc__) && !defined (__sparc64__)
        if (!CPU_ISSUN4OR4C)

Reply via email to