Using the same test on OpenNTPD from OpenBSD-STABLE:
# cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/
# for i in $(find . -name "*.[ch]"); do cat $i >> /root/allcode; done
# egrep -v '[:blank:]*/?\*' /root/allcode | grep -v "^ *$" | wc -l
2898
Quite a difference indeed.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 7:26 PM, trondd <tro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org>
> wrote:
>
>> whereas ntp.org's codebase is reportedly 100,000 lines of
>> unknown or largely unused code
>>
>
> That made me curious. Is it that bloated?
>
> $ for i in $(find . -name "*.[ch]"); do cat $i >> allcode; done
> $ egrep -v '[:blank:]*/?\*' allcode | grep -v "^ *$" | wc -l
> 192870
>
> This is ntp-4.2.8 A rough estimate but close enough if we are comparing to
> a know solution that is <5000.
>
> Keep up the good work.
> Tim.
--
"BSD is what happens when Unix programmers port Unix to the x86.
Linux is what happens when x86 programmers write a Unix-like.
Windows is what happens when x86 programmers run all of their
programming textbooks through a blender, eat the ground up
remains of the text, and then code up what they can read in the
toilet 3 days later."
