>On 05/01/15 11:17, Theo de Raadt wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Riley Baird >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Even when building with the NOMAN option, "which" will not build without >>>> the manpage whereis.1 being present. >>> >>> Building from an incomplete source tree is not supported (deleting >>> just the manpages!?!?). If you want to waste your own time in this >>> particular way, you can bear the cost of doing so by keeping that diff >>> in your sandbox instead of cluttering the tree. >> >> Riley, this is OpenBSD. >> >> Since you have effectively declared a fork for various reasons -- please >> leave. You are on your own now. Your presence here just shows that you >> don't have what it takes. > >Okay, sure. I thought that we could keep politics out of things like >patches, but I guess not.
Hi Riley, Your patch is wrong. Your politics are wrong too. And in my view your ethics are wrong because you are trying to steal from others by charging money for OpenBSD outside of the development process. You are allowed to charge money of course, others do as well. But you are trying to act like you are some sort of humanitarian -- in fact more of a humanitarian than the existing developers of the project -- which is a despicable joke. You are saying 10% of what you collect without oversight will go to the OpenBSD Foundation, 90% to you. Switch it around, and you might actually stand in the same shoes as the many creators of this ecosystem. Leave it unchanged, and you are a dirtbag. Perhaps you thought you were the first? So just GO AWAY, until you figure it out. If you do figure it out, I frankly don't care, because you have added no development value in the past, and I have seen zero evidence that you will add development value in the future. You are simply doing this for money.
