On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Gilles Chehade <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:23:59AM -0600, Brent Cook wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:38:37PM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: >> > fatal should completely be variadic, a printf-alike. >> > >> >> How about something like this for making fatal variadic first. >> This factors out the guts of log_warn and adds logerr that they both can >> share. >> > > we have variadic fatal/x in smtpd in case you're interested ;-)
Sure! - the fewer variadic variations, the better. I'm almost surprised these aren't all in -lutil or something.
