On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:03:36 -0600, Brent Cook wrote: > Here is a revised version that doesn't break initial queries, > and puts the check in the correct place I think.
I think this is now correct. OK millert@ - todd
On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:03:36 -0600, Brent Cook wrote: > Here is a revised version that doesn't break initial queries, > and puts the check in the correct place I think.
I think this is now correct. OK millert@ - todd