Jason McIntyre <j...@kerhand.co.uk> writes: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 09:49:58PM -0600, Adam Thompson wrote: >> Fix a minor typo in the ntpctl help output, and same semantic mistake in the >> manpage. Currently says (to be pedantic) that '-s' only works with 'all', >> which is not the case: '-s' is required with all options. >> Apologies if I've got the patch format wrong, I don't do this often... >> -Adam >> >> >> --- ntpd.c_r1.92 Fri Feb 13 21:43:39 2015 >> +++ ntpd.c Fri Feb 13 21:43:49 2015 >> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ >> >> if (strcmp(__progname, "ntpctl") == 0) >> fprintf(stderr, >> - "usage: ntpctl [-s all | peers | Sensors | status]\n"); >> + "usage: ntpctl -s [all | peers | Sensors | status]\n"); >> else >> fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s [-dnSsv] [-f file]\n", >> __progname); >> >> >> --- ntpctl.8_r1.7 Fri Feb 13 21:39:53 2015 >> +++ ntpctl.8 Fri Feb 13 21:40:32 2015 >> @@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ >> .Nd control the Network Time Protocol daemon >> .Sh SYNOPSIS >> .Nm ntpctl >> -.Op Fl s Cm all | peers | Sensors | status >> +.Fl s >> +.Op Cm all | peers | Sensors | status >> .Sh DESCRIPTION >> The >> .Nm >> > > i didn;t realise that -s was mandatory. pretty yucky that we have a > utility with only one option, and it's not optional ;(
Maybe ntpctl will provide more options/features one day, who knows? :) -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
