On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote: ... > I agree with your analysis of the grammar, but I believe that is what > the code is doing. That line in question is the one that puts the bare > semicolon before the date-time. The newlines have been re-arranged so > that the semicolon occurs at the end of the line. > > Or am I misunderstanding you/the RFC?
Ah, I misread the placement in the diff; you're correct, the original diff is fine and should be applied. Philip
