> Any objections?
Considering I am the one who requested it, obviously no objection :-)
I've successfully tested this with ports that used to need ports/lang/gcc/4.9 .
So as far as I am concerned, OK for me.
> Index: c-decl.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /OpenBSD/src/gnu/gcc/gcc/c-decl.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -p -r1.2 c-decl.c
> --- c-decl.c 29 Apr 2010 18:37:37 -0000 1.2
> +++ c-decl.c 2 May 2015 14:35:28 -0000
> @@ -1285,9 +1285,17 @@ diagnose_mismatched_decls (tree newdecl,
> if (DECL_IN_SYSTEM_HEADER (newdecl) || DECL_IN_SYSTEM_HEADER (olddecl))
> return true; /* Allow OLDDECL to continue in use. */
>
> - error ("redefinition of typedef %q+D", newdecl);
> - locate_old_decl (olddecl, error);
> - return false;
> + if (pedantic)
> + {
> + pedwarn ("redefinition of typedef %q+D", newdecl);
> + if (flag_pedantic_errors)
> + {
> + locate_old_decl (olddecl, error);
> + return false;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> }
>
> /* Function declarations can either be 'static' or 'extern' (no
>
--
Antoine
