> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 15:17:46 +0100
> From: Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org>
>
> On 2015/07/08 15:53, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Index: uvm_map.c
> ..
> > @@ -2466,8 +2470,7 @@ uvm_map_teardown(struct vm_map *map)
> > if ((entry = RB_ROOT(&map->addr)) != NULL)
> > DEAD_ENTRY_PUSH(&dead_entries, entry);
> > while (entry != NULL) {
> > - if (waitok)
> > - uvm_pause();
> > + sched_pause();
>
> ah, slightly different than the one I've tried before which
> had uvm_pause instead of sched_pause here plus an extra change
> in uvm_glue.c.
Just a bit of a cleanup though. Not going to make a difference.
> I'll give this a spin on i386 after my current build finishes.
> FWIW I've been running the previous version on amd64 for ages with
> very positive results.
I won't stop you ;). But my goal was to trick others into testing
this diff such that this doesn't hamper the i386 ports builds.
