On 2015/09/29 14:27, Peter Hessler wrote: > On 2015 Sep 28 (Mon) at 22:23:49 +0200 (+0200), Matthieu Herrb wrote: > :On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 02:37:38AM -0600, David Coppa wrote: > :> > :> Hi! > :> > :> Here's an update to libxcb-1.11.1 > :> > :> Changes: > :> > :> - Expose 64-bit sequence numbers for XLib > :> - Call _xcb_wake_up_next_reader from xcb_wait_for_special_event > :> - Fix a thread hang with xcb_wait_for_special_event() > :> > :> Tested in a full xenocara rebuild on amd64. > :> I think a minor crank is required. > : > :The diff looks ok, but we currently don't have anything in xenocara > :using the new functions. Do you know any application in ports that > :would use it if available ? > : > > Is it that painful to bump a library minor? I think we should always be > safe and bump even when we don't know if it would be used.
Oh I was assuming this related to testing rather than bumps. Yes a bump is necessary, it's not about what current ports do, but about what future updates might start using.
