Philip Guenther wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Jonathan Gray <[email protected]> wrote: > > This isn't just removing support for gcc 2 it is removing support > > for anything that doesn't define __GNUC__ and implement all the gnu > > attributes which isn't what we want. > > Yep. We've now seen a couple diffs labeled "remove gcc2 support" > which were unable to contain themselves to that. If you want to > suggest something contentious, then say so instead of rolling it into > something everyone can agree on...and then don't be surprised when > it's contentious. If you want to do something sure and simple, then > DO SOMETHING SIMPLE.
I wasn't trying to suggest something contentious, I just (incorrectly) thought that there were different cdefs.h copies for the kernel and userland. Mistake acknowledged.
